The novel, for example, attempts to explain things much more explicitly than the film does, which is inevitable in a verbal medium. It’s a totally different kind of experience, of course, and there are a number of differences between the book and the movie. In a 1970 interview, Kubrick talked more about the difference between the two works. Kubrick, in contrast, explained almost nothing. Clarke explains everything in the story in great detail – from the man-apes’ evolution to the real reason HAL9000 went on his killing spree. Most of the other differences boil down to a difference in the medium. But Kubrick’s special effects guru Douglas Trumbull couldn’t get the ringed planet to look right, so the director simply changed the mission’s destination. One of the biggest differences is that in the book, HAL, Dave Bowman and company are off to Saturn. You can watch part one and part two above. If you can get past the bro-tastic voice-over, the piece offers a pretty thorough accounting. The folks over at Cinefix put together a video on the differences between the book and the movie. Ever the master manipulator, Kubrick, in all likelihood, did this on purpose so that Clarke’s efforts wouldn’t overshadow the film. The book ultimately came out a couple months after the movie’s April 1968 premiere.
#Who wrote 2001 a space odyssey book movie
Kubrick demanded rewrite after rewrite from an increasingly impatient Clarke as the movie went into production. In practice, the script developed in parallel to the book. The original plan was for both to develop the novel first and then adapt the resulting work into a screenplay. Over the course of the next four years, Kubrick and Clarke talked and corresponded frequently. The two soon met at Trader Vic’s in New York and started hashing out a story that became 2001: A Space Odyssey. A space probe with a landing and exploration of the Moon and Mars. The impact (and perhaps even lack of impact in some quarters) such discovery would have on Earth in the near future.ģ. The reasons for believing in the existence of intelligent extra-terrestrial life.Ģ. My main interest lies along these broad areas, naturally assuming great plot and character:ġ. I had been a great admirer of your books for quite a time and had always wanted to discuss with you the possibility of doing the proverbial “really good” science-fiction movie. Clarke, after reading his short story “ The Sentinel.” In a letter dated March 31, 1964, Kubrick wrote: And so, the director reached out to writer Arthur C. He wanted to make a science fiction epic at a time when sci-fi was a byword for cheap and cheesy. For his next film, Kubrick wanted to make something different.
In 1964, Stanley Kubrick was riding high from the success of his Cold War black comedy Dr.
0 kommentar(er)
